Inhalt
- | Kapitel kaufen Titelei1
- | Kapitel kaufen Inhaltsverzeichnis2
- | Kapitel kaufen Beiträge aus Forschung und Anwendung3
- | Kapitel kaufen Syntax/Semantik-Schnittstelle3
- | Kapitel kaufen Patrick Brandt: Fehlkonstruktion und Reparatur in der Bedeutungskomposition3
- | Kapitel kaufen Syntax42
- | Kapitel kaufen Werner Abraham: Pervasive underspecification of diathesis, modality, and structural case coding: the gerund in historical and modern German42
- | Kapitel kaufen Graphematik80
- | Kapitel kaufen Si-Taek Yu & Karl Heinz Ramers: Die Beziehung zwischen phonologischer und graphematischer Repräsentation in der Vokalschreibung des Deutschen80
- | Kapitel kaufen Rezension127
- | Kapitel kaufen Silvio Cruschina: Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.) (2015): Discourse-oriented Syntax.127
- | Kapitel kaufen Informationen und Hinweise135
- | Kapitel kaufen LB-Info135
- | Kapitel kaufen Jahresinhaltsverzeichnis (Jahrgang 2016)137
Beschreibung
The focus of this paper is about the copula+infinitive in Modern German, its older stages, and its dialectal and sociolectal varieties. In doing so, the paper comes to conclusions different from other discussion of this topic, mainly Demske 1994. The prepositional infinitive and the verbal substantive (gerund) in modern German are not only minimally distinct syntactic structures, but they also have a clear sociolectal distribution: gerunds are more or less restricted to the spoken dialects with the prepositional infinitive/PI being banned from South German/SG, while the PI is the standard in Modern German/MStG. It is shown that the historically original gerundial form was heavily underspecified with respect to a number of grammatical codes. The prepositional infinitive, which grew out of this gerund due to the later demise of case coding on the infinitive, lost the original multiplicity of meaning to make room for only one meaning component: the modality of necessity. Attention will be drawn to adjacent meanings that the modern dialectal gerund encapsulates: the tough-movement construal, the modal
passive, and both reason and purpose embedded question infinitivals. Languages other than German adduced for comparison are Gothic, Old and Middle English, modern Dutch, and Polish. Next to tough-construals and their structural and semantic conditions, also sluicing construals are considered and discussed in some detail. Yet, the main question this discussion pursues is why it is that the oral-only coded sociolects (and their historical predecessors) take recourse to the old gerundial forms, while the modern written standard of German developed the prepositional infinitive – either formal variant almost entirely to the exclusion of the other.
passive, and both reason and purpose embedded question infinitivals. Languages other than German adduced for comparison are Gothic, Old and Middle English, modern Dutch, and Polish. Next to tough-construals and their structural and semantic conditions, also sluicing construals are considered and discussed in some detail. Yet, the main question this discussion pursues is why it is that the oral-only coded sociolects (and their historical predecessors) take recourse to the old gerundial forms, while the modern written standard of German developed the prepositional infinitive – either formal variant almost entirely to the exclusion of the other.
Beachten Sie auch folgende Titel