Contents
- | Kapitel kaufen Titelei1
- | Kapitel kaufen Inhaltsverzeichnis2
- | Kapitel kaufen Beiträge aus Forschung und Anwendung2
- | Kapitel kaufen Syntax3
- | Kapitel kaufen Gisbert Fanselow & Thomas Weskott: A Short Note on Long Movement in German 3
- | Kapitel kaufen Phonologie15
- | Kapitel kaufen Muna Pohl & Janet Grijzenhout: Phrase-Medial Bilabial Stops in Three West Germanic Languages 15
- | Kapitel kaufen Zweitspracherwerb42
- | Kapitel kaufen Nadezhda Varley: Functional Categories and Parameter Resetting in Second Language Acquisition: A Cross-Sectional Study on CP Development and Expletive Suppliance 42
- | Kapitel kaufen Konversationsanalyse77
- | Kapitel kaufen Lorenz Sichelschmidt, Kyung-Won Jang, Hendrik Kösling, Helge Ritter, Petra Weiß: Alignment in aufgabenorientierten Dialogen: ein multimodales Such- und Vergleichs-Korpus 77
- | Kapitel kaufen Diskussion103
- | Kapitel kaufen Cornelia Ebert: Hans-Christian Schmitz: Accentuation and Interpretation103
- | Kapitel kaufen Rezensionen118
- | Kapitel kaufen Anne Kathrin Doerr, Nicolai Kircher, Jörg Meibauer, Sven Müller, Laura Neuhaus, Marie Luise Rau: Mira Ariel: Pragmatics and Grammar 118
- | Kapitel kaufen Jenneke van der Wal: Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (hg.): On Information Structure, Meaning and Form 123
- | Kapitel kaufen Informationen und Hinweise127
- | Kapitel kaufen LB-Info127
- | Kapitel kaufen Hinweise für Autorinnen und Autoren131
Details
Empirically based research on second language acquisition (further L2A) has proven to be full of possibilities for delving further into the acquisition of functional L2 categories. The current paper discusses general considerations concerning the extent to which the second language learner (L2er) is influenced by the first language (L1) grammar, the transfer – or the rise – of L2 functional properties, and the phenomenon of optionality in interlanguage grammars (ILGs), particularly focusing on the nature of linguistic knowledge that is available at different stages beyond the commencement of L2A. Drawing on the data from various levels of L2A, I have found ample empirical support for the claim that the reparametrisation of [+strong] L1 to [–strong] L2 features is a recalcitrant task to accomplish even in advanced ILGs, whereas the V2-parameter (motivated by verb-raising which is also available in the L1) is accurately acquired. Thus, the data obtained on the development of CP shell and expletives in TP has turned out to be consistent with my assumption that there is a kind of impairment in the syntactic module of L2 faculty, specifically associated with L2 uninterpretable features.
Also note the following titles