Inhalt
- | Kapitel kaufen Titelei1
- | Kapitel kaufen Inhaltsverzeichnis2
- | Kapitel kaufen Eine Ära geht zu Ende3
- | Kapitel kaufen Beiträge aus Forschung und Anwendung5
- | Kapitel kaufen Lexikalische Semantik5
- | Kapitel kaufen Marga Reis: Dt. finden und „subjektive Bedeutung“* 5
- | Kapitel kaufen Syntax-Semantik-Schnittstelle43
- | Kapitel kaufen Mailin Antomo & Markus Steinbach: Zur Semantik von Konzessivsätzen mit obwohl∗43
- | Kapitel kaufen Diachrone Syntax70
- | Kapitel kaufen Susann Fischer & Esther Rinke: Explaining the variability of clitic doubling across Romance: a diachronic account70
- | Kapitel kaufen Phonologie88
- | Kapitel kaufen Sebastian Kaiser & Stefan Baumann: Satzmodus und die Diskurspartikel hm: Intonation und Interpretation88
- | Kapitel kaufen Rezension112
- | Kapitel kaufen Erich M. Groat: Johan Rooryck and Guido Vanden Wyngaerd: Dissolving Binding Theory112
- | Kapitel kaufen Informationen und Hinweise120
- | Kapitel kaufen LB-Info120
- | Kapitel kaufen Jahresinhaltsverzeichnis (Jahrgang 2013)123
Beschreibung
This paper is about German finden as a subjective attitude verb (Sue findet, dass das gut ist/ Sue findet das gut), about which I aim to find out in what sense it has 'subjective meaning', and how this meaning is rooted in its lexial properties. Based on an intensive discussion of Saebø's (2009) influential analysis, I argue, contra Saebø, that finden's subjectivity is not exclusively rooted in the complement let alone identifiable with semantic judge-variance of the complement predicates. Rather, finden itself is crucially involved in that it projects (i) the presupposition that there is an eventuality known to the finden subject, which is under debate and open to interpretation, (ii) a reading of the complement proposition as an interpretation of this eventuality selected by the finden subject from a set of interpretational alternatives; it is with this selection process that the finden specific subjectivity is to be identified. I cite a number of arguments for these claims (summed up in (H1)), backing them up by pragmatic considerations (summed up in (H2)). Finally, I show that the syntactic form of the finden complement as a finite vs. small clause construction correlates with selectional differences, for which I offer a speculative explanation.
Beachten Sie auch folgende Titel